there's good evidence that if Ds had been in power for the past 40 years, the racial wealth gap would no longer exist. also everyone's income improves under D govt, more than under R. the argument that Dems don't help anyone is just false. 1https://twitter.com/rosemcgowan/status/1296655667063861249 …
-
Show this thread
-
I talk about the evidence here;https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-s-suburban-lifestyle-tweet-mixes-race-class-here-s-ncna1235234 …
5 replies 14 retweets 58 likesShow this thread -
now, should Ds do more on police brutality, for example? absolutely. lots and lots of ways in which Ds are not doing enough. but "Ds don't do anything so Trump won"—that's false, and dangerous, inasmuch as it misleads people into thinking voting is useless, or into both sides bs.
3 replies 18 retweets 119 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @nberlat
Democrats dismantled the welfare safety net and created the modern prison system bc Dukakis was made fun of once.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
Ds didn't create the modern prison system or dismantle the safety net? there's bipartisan blame for both those things, but it's also clear who's been further to the right on both.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
That's a red herring. The Ds are a conservative party who don't share my basic values, much less fight for them. They are also, yes, less far right than the Republicans, though not less far right than the Republicans of my youth.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
Ds have been moving left for 20 years. again, there's empirical evidence the racial wealth gap drops during D admins. If you don't care about that, you don't care, but I think that that indifference is immoral, and you should reconsider.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nberlat
I care, but claiming if we'd had only Democratic administrations there'd be no racial wealth gap is harmful. A one party system wouldn't have destroyed the racial wealth gap, it's not something that could have happened, and it's not something we should want.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Talking about one party consistently *winning* is not the same as talking about a "one party system", Jesus
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Believing that one party winning all the time would make them a better party is the same as believing in a one party system, though.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.