Big umbrella term, yep, saw that part. I'll have a look at the pinned thread- it'll take a minute because I'm on tweetdeck so I'll have to go find you on twitter proper, but I want to take in as much context as necessary before blowing you away with my unimpeachable logic (lol).
-
-
Replying to @e_urq
Looking forward to it. I've got bookmarks and am not afraid to use them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grown_UpWoman
Am I right in thinking that by transsexual you mean someone who has had genital surgery? Maybe someone who both passes and has genital surgery, but not someone who passes and hasn't had genital surgery? But, genital surgery is crucial- I'm not getting that wrong?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
There's usually some kind of meaningful transition and attempt to actually live as the opposite sex. Not all of them have bottom surgery; that was the thing I was naive about. I'm fine with the ones who at least attempt to pass as female but some just take the everlasting mickey
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grown_UpWoman
Hmm. OK, I'm glad I asked for clarification. I'm not sure we have as much disagreement as I thought. Are you saying that trans women should be treated as women except in rare cases where they are so gender nonconforming as to be visually indistinguishable from men?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
I don't agree 100% but it does seem like a pretty small corner of the issue and maybe not worth disputing too strongly. It also sounds like you think passing is pretty important, maybe more important than genitals, which makes my standard thought experiment less relevant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
Unless your danglies are on display and being waved around it's nobody's business what you've got down there. Be unobtrusive. Being intrusive is the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grown_UpWoman
The counter would be that prejudiced people tend to treat 'going about our lives" as if its some big angry political statement all the time. But, to me it sounds like your error is more about thinking rare things are common than thinking non-scary things are scary.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
I'm not the one in error and I'm not under any moral obligation to give up my personal boundaries to accommodate men's feelings. Ever. Please get that idea out of your head right now. Women are not obliged to pander to men as a condition of entry to "not a bigot" status.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grown_UpWoman @e_urq
Any suggestion that we are is base misogyny and posits that a) we are an inferior servant class of person and b) this is morally acceptable and immutable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm afraid I'm still not following you.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.