For every detransitioner there are a hundred trans men who knew who we were and what we wanted.
-
Show this thread
-
As individuals, detransitioners are often very nice people with understandable stories. But the purpose of people bringing attention to detransitioners and amplifying their stories is to take advantage of trans men's invisibility to discredit and deny us.
2 replies 5 retweets 57 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @e_urq
What we know about detransitioners is they made a major mistake on identity matters at least once already. Asbsolutely no shame in working your shit out, but this is not a group people should listen to when a much larger group of people who made similar decisions wasn't wrong.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
What do we know about detransitioners? Where's the robust research? A study of natal males from the GID era? Not the same. Research is thwarted by politics. Detransitioners are invisible data. *No one* is tracking them. Tada! They don't exist! Funny how that works.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @TakeLuckSerious
Hey I'm all for more research but there's literally no research supporting a wave of AFAB detransition. Theres conjecture and innuendo, but that's not the same. If you're all about evidence why not come back when you have evidence?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
Detrans research is "taboo" and politically inconvenient. It is SUCH a powder keg, most will not touch it/fear job loss."Must b bc numbers r so low." Not. James Capsian tried. What happened there? Swedes may be starting bc they see the iatrogenic risks, the regret going up.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TakeLuckSerious
What if it's not taboo, but the people who are interested in pushing detransition narratives don't want to use their right-wing Christian money for a real study because they know or suspect the results wouldn't come out the way they want them to?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
There's tons of money out there- more than enough to fund a real study or two, or three. You just gotta ask yourself- why aren't they funding the research if they're so sure it would support their theory?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.