*BANG* A great thread even before this tweet, but this right here is the killshot.https://twitter.com/confusedophan/status/1208023637074333697 …
-
Show this thread
-
If you insist no medicine, however advanced, could change a person's sex ultimately you'll wrap back around to meaning the sex of a person's intangible soul as separate from the sex of their body. Ironically the exact unscientific fantasy trans people are accused of having.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
And of course if you *actually* mean that you’d accept a sex change if and only if medicine developed a way to change ones chromosomes that is completely arbitrary and incoherent. Why that change and not the other changes people are already availing themselves of?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
If you’d *actually* only accept a change that made a trans person fertile in their transitioned sex, then would trans people who started out infertile in their birth-assigned sex also have to become fertile, or would they be granted an exception?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
If the fertility inducing procedure was only effective in 10% of cases would only people for whom it worked have truly changed their sex, or would the attempt satisfy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
If an attempt to become a fertile in one's transitioned sex, w/ a 1 in 10 chance, WOULD satisfy, why not also allow an unlikelier attempt? For instance, if a trans person prayed to God to change their sex, even if the prayer is not answered, that would be sufficient?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Hey look! I think we just got self ID!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @e_urq
it's almost like transphobia, like all bigotry, has no logic behind it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.