You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
*BANG* A great thread even before this tweet, but this right here is the killshot.https://twitter.com/confusedophan/status/1208023637074333697 …
If you insist no medicine, however advanced, could change a person's sex ultimately you'll wrap back around to meaning the sex of a person's intangible soul as separate from the sex of their body. Ironically the exact unscientific fantasy trans people are accused of having.
And of course if you *actually* mean that you’d accept a sex change if and only if medicine developed a way to change ones chromosomes that is completely arbitrary and incoherent. Why that change and not the other changes people are already availing themselves of?
If you’d *actually* only accept a change that made a trans person fertile in their transitioned sex, then would trans people who started out infertile in their birth-assigned sex also have to become fertile, or would they be granted an exception?
If the fertility inducing procedure was only effective in 10% of cases would only people for whom it worked have truly changed their sex, or would the attempt satisfy?
If an attempt to become a fertile in one's transitioned sex, w/ a 1 in 10 chance, WOULD satisfy, why not also allow an unlikelier attempt? For instance, if a trans person prayed to God to change their sex, even if the prayer is not answered, that would be sufficient?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
