You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
So yeah, this is my guess: If there are mass protests against detention centers (or something similar) taking a moral stand against Trumpism, and if the Democratic candidate makes common cause with them, the media narrative will shift enough for the Dem to win on those grounds.
But, if there aren't mass protests changing the "optics" of a Democratic nominee making a moral case against Trump, then that case will not succeed bc it will be fatally undermined by the both-sidesing of the media.
There is no point to making a moral case now. The grab her video didn't work in 2016 and nothing with more impact has come out since. We may prefer otherwise, but a moral case doesn't decide how people vote. There's moral and there's self-interest. Guess which wins?
And then there is #metoo
, which nailed dozens of prominent Democrats and Republicans. Add in Epstein, and who can credibly make a claim to moral purity now? Maybe Jimmy Carter and Billy Graham. After them? <crickets>
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
