Evan Urquhart

1. Semenya is not trans 2. Semenya wins bc she’s incredible 3. There are many biological advantages; eg. height 4. There are many social advantages; eg. nutrition as a child due to wealth of family 5. We don’t split competition due to 3 or 4 6. This is bigotry masking as concern https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1119131011735064576 …

idk about this, so im asking,HONESTLY, could someone explain to me how it's fair to either female sports, or transgender athletes, if they compete on the same fields? im not being condescending, i truly have no clue how this is supposed to work, for either....

It isn't. Everything about a Male to female transgender is Male. (Except for their removed dick). Men generally have higher bone densities, more athletic hip positions. No periods. Feminists are ruining sport by letting men into their competitions.

Bone density decreases with hormones- periods definitely don’t have anything to do with athletic performance and if pelvis shape does it’s the first I’ve heard of it.

So letting biological males compete in women's sports is perfectly ok? You are gonna go with there is no advantage?

The extensive drug and testing regimen for trans Olympic athletes negates any advantage. If there's evidence to call that into question the regimen can be adjusted. Just saying the words "biological males" doesn't have any bearing for someone looking at this logically.

Logic would say men compete with men and women compete with women. But it's 2019, logic has been thrown out the window. No matter what every cell in that man's body is still Male.

I think logic would say that everyone compete with each other. Then we observe that men and women tend to cluster around different ability levels and decide to divide competition into sex categories.