Littman's study wasn't "complete" either. It was merely an exploration of the OBVIOUS change in the frequency & demographic of gender dysphorics that are not consistent with previous patterns of GD. Actual experts (not internet exhibitionists) have also noted this change.
All this sort of competing ideology stuff is irrelevant, and quite boring, as far as I'm concerned. What's relevant is identifying patients with certain symptoms that will be helped by a treatment.
-
-
I had lifelong discomfort with my body, as well as psychiatric symptoms including depersonalization that interfered with my quality of life. Like other patients with similar symptoms, they resolved with treatment.
-
If there's a problem with false positives- with patients who aren't helped by the treatment receiving the treatment, I could not be more supportive of efforts to better identify which patients will be helped and which won't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.