“corporations build inventory loss into their accounting and are insured” Were you born this stupid or was it an acquired skill?
-
-
Replying to @AchillesProtos @BeHeadR and
Not that amount of inventory loss


this hurts ppl at the bottom, are you slow???1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
...absolutely this amount of inventory loss lol, this is petty shoplifting, not a natural disaster
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
That amount "isnt petty", NO ONE can afford if this happens often, which it DOES, BOOM!https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2021-05-26-walgreens-closes-17-stores-in-san-francisco-because-of-rampant-theft/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
Lol anything is possible if you lie. The spike in crime is super recent, not since 2014, almost as if there was a major economic collapse and pandemic.
Not to mention the plan to close stores preceded the spike by several years.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
You didn’t read the article did you? Stop trying to act as if stealing over 100 items is the same as stealing 1 item, you should learn basic math some time
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
They basically are. You’re viewing this as a pleb, you gotta step into the shoes of what this looks like as “loss” for a multibillion dollar corporation. Do you think WG’s pays $12 for shampoo bottles??
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
You think everything is centralized
do you know how double entry accounting works? They do separate accounting for each location, no corporation subsidizes their stores. Typical liberal, doesn’t understand shit about economics or corporate accounting1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @anoninetuser @AchillesProtos and
Not a liberal.
And yes, plenty of corporations subsidize their stores - WG owns about 15% outright - but that’s besides the point.
They have insurance for this. They lose 0 dollars.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dyssomniac @AchillesProtos and
Insurance doesn’t cover irregular events, and you don’t care about raising the prices of insurance premiums of other customers cuz of constant petty theft. You’re a lefty when you believe in “voodoo economics”, theft is bad, even 4 year olds know this
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
What? Lmao, retail business insurance covers theft - the pricing and overhead of the store takes into account all the shoplifting that ISN’T seen. This has nothing to do with econ. It’s basic accounting practices.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.