No, getting it right is not easy. You need to consult a range of folks including folks who do field work with high risk users.
-
-
-
Yes, many of them are annoying to engage with — I'm sorry about that. Yes, you didn't sign up to be a security trainer and are on deadline.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
who's lives are being put at risk, exactly? So far no one had died from a computer virus.
-
reporters are just as bad on every other technical topic. Remember ebola coverage? Probably far more relevant to ppls lives.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
well there was the situation in Turkey where the government hacked some msging program used by the coup plotters.
-
obviously if you're planning to overthrow a government bad opsec is a problem, but that's not a typical use case.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, this whole thread. FYI, I'm happy to be a resource, as someone with a "safe" title & background knowledge in unsafe things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you mean like when saying whatsapp is safe when it clearly isn't? That's a good way of protecting activists from repressive gvmnts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@tuoni_uk And if you don't write articles on security you need to understand that what you don't say can put lives at risk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.