Duncan Hollis

@DuncanHollis

Professor @ Temple Law School; Non-Resident Fellow Carnegie Endowment for Int'l Peace; Member, OAS Juridical Committee

opiniojuris.org
Joined February 2011
46 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @DuncanHollis

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @DuncanHollis

  1. Retweeted
    Dec 4

    To better understand in , you might be interested in this selection of articles on the topic, including by ➡️

    1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Dec 3

    Simply put, States hacking hospitals & vaccine research in the midst of a global pandemic is an outrageous threat to all our lives. Responsible States should stand up & agree that int'l law prohibits this activity & that they've got positive obligations to stop or mitigate it

    1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Dec 3

    It's also worth emphasizing that int'l law is not limited to prohibitions that may have ltd effects on already stigmatized/sanctioned States; positive obligations (one or more versions of due diligence) may be more effective in responding to this threat

    1 reply 2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Dec 3

    Counter-measures should be available for such activity (& maybe this would be a place for further dialogue on progressively developing int'l law to allow "collective" counter measures ala New Zealand & Estonia's recent calls)

    1 reply 3 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Dec 3

    And I'm not alone -- more than 100 other international lawyers agree with me.

    1 reply 2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Dec 3

    NYT: State-sponsored ransomware against vaccine distribution supply chain technologies may be in our futures? My take: Not only must int'l law prohibit such activity, but other States should take steps to mitigate or respond to threat as/before it happens

    1 reply 7 retweets 19 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Dec 2

    Roger was exceedingly generous with his time when I first joined the Academy. Congratulations on a long, distinguished run in the classroom.

    Today marks the end of an era as Professor Roger Clark teaches his last classes @RutgersLawSchool! If you're so inclined, please reach out to let him know how much you appreciated him as a colleague, friend, professor, mentor, or running buddy!
    1 like
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Dec 2

    Congratulations to on her appointment as dean. Prof. Brunnee was one of my stellar professors almost 2 decades ago. I'm hopeful that she'll restore the 's integrity by making amends to put the hiring scandal behind us.

    3 replies 7 retweets 66 likes
    Undo
  9. Dec 2

    Seriously, if there’s one piece of pie left you go around and get consent from everyone else in the family before you eat it, right? Anything else is just anarchy.

    1 reply
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Dec 2

    Consider my most recent accusation w/o attribution — someone in my family clearly ate the last piece of apple pie w/o asking if it was OK - that is clearly unacceptable behavior that we must all condemn and take steps to defend against in the future.

    2 replies 2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Dec 2

    & while Kristen doesn’t endorse our idea of distinguishing accusations from attributions, I still think accusations are a useful (multi-functional) concept that can help unearth & defend against bad things done by ‘someone’ even w/o identifying the things’ specific author.

    1 reply
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Dec 2

    It’s important as well to note how much our work was influenced by own scholarship on attribution, go read it now -

    1 reply 2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Dec 2

    An earlier draft of our article is up on SSRN. EJIL should publish the final version later this month.

    1 reply 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Dec 2

    Thanks so much to for liking & engaging with Marty Finnemore & my forthcoming EJIL article!

    1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Dec 1

    Two times now in Supreme Court oral argument —most recently in response to Justice Kagan— professor David Golove’s breakthrough research on extraterritoriality of Alien Tort Statute is cited. Golove’s historical research (Jefferson & Randolph letters)👇

    1 reply 15 retweets 31 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Dec 1

    For more immediate reactions and views on all the doctrinal positioning go read

    3 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Dec 1

    After all, it’s not about applying intl law for intl law’s sake; it’s about how intl law protects us & the infrastructure we need to live & function as a society

    1 reply 3 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Dec 1

    Also nice to see NZ focus on protecting the functionality of the healthcare sector and elections - both subjects of earlier Oxford Statements

    1 reply 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Dec 1

    I think it also pushes States to say more - eg w/o the Oxford Statements would NZ have explained & qualified its views on due diligence in such detail?

    2 replies 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Dec 1

    Official NZ views on Intl law in cyberspace are out. Note the reference to Oxford Process & Tallinn. This suggests States pay attention when intl lawyers speak out collectively

    1 reply 14 retweets 45 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo

@DuncanHollis hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·