ah yes. Let's make a condescending joke about JavaScript. How original.
In Ruby, everything is an object. In Clojure, everything is a list. In Javascript, everything is a terrible mistake.
-
-
-
Thanks for your support!
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
@duggan world is full of terrible people. Why we blame a language? -
@mistyHarsh Forget the terrible people, the world could be destroyed by an asteroid at any moment due to our inadequate orbital defences!
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
-
@olivergierke@joschi83 perhaps, but that doesn’t make for a snappy joke
- Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
-
@ryanflorence@duggan so javascript has no primitives? -
-
@ryanflorence@duggan primitives are objects? -
@ryanflorence@Jarsen@duggan except you're using a String there and not a string primitive; primitives can't have props -
@jenseng that primitive string still has methods on it, its just non-assignable in "primitive" form.@Jarsen@dugganpic.twitter.com/YnIaOl6Lu7
-
@ryanflorence sure, but the methods belong to the prototype, i wouldn't call the primitive an object@Jarsen - Nog 2 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
I wish I could downvote tweets
- Nog 1 antwoord
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
@duggan@Luiz0x29A in JavaScript, undefined is not a function -
@h2co3_ios@duggan@luiz0x29a fixed :) with({ undefined: () => {} })(typeof undefined) // "function" -
@JamesKyburz@H2CO3_iOS@duggan@Luiz0x29A But that's deprecated! The correct implementation: (undefined => typeof undefined)(()=>{}) -
@joepie91@H2CO3_iOS@duggan@Luiz0x29A :) not deprecated afaik, but 'with' doesn't work in strict mode -
@JamesKyburz@H2CO3_iOS@duggan@Luiz0x29A Fair enough. You still shouldn't use it, though ;) -
that's the sanest thing I saw in JS, "USE IT", or never use JS
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.