it's wild that at literally any point CD Projekt could've just said "hey we're so fucking sorry, we overestimated, we need more time with this, it'll be done when it's done and we'll give a new date when we know, we're sorry" and everyone would've been bummed but understanding
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
they had SO MUCH goodwill built up over the witcher than unless you were plugged in on some of the shittier marketing discourse (aka transphobia) you just knew "Witcher good, Cyberpunk sounds great" and would be willing to wait for it! everyone would've been cool with it!
1 odpowiedź 2 podane dalej 76 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
(this is not to excuse or dismiss the transphobia or shitty racial stereotyping, etc, just pointing out that if you weren't Dialed Into Gaming, as most people who buy games are not, you probably didn't even know about it)
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 64 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
the stock price would've dipped, but been fine long term. no investors would've bailed on that cash cow over another delay after how successful the witcher was, esp after the Netflix series. they would've been fine in EVERY respect. they said themselves there was no pressure.
2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 46 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
this is a disaster ENTIRELY of their own (by they I mean The Folks In Charge) making. super preventable, at so many different stages, by just chilling the hell out and not promising things and deadlines they couldn't deliver on
9 odpowiedzi 3 podane dalej 67 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @duckvalentine
IDK, this all kind of assumes there was ever the chance for Cyberpunk to be a good game. My take is that (unlike Witcher) leadership had nothing to say about the genre besides "future = sexalot", and that without a clear POV, there was never going to be a game here.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
I think that's probably true, but here I'm mostly considering mainstream reception. I'm pretty confident that if the game functioned well and looked good then the more nuanced and interesting critical opinions would remain just that: nuanced and interesting, but not widely shared
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @duckvalentine
Yeah, that's extremely fair.
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.