I also think pieces examining or reviewing a game a week, a month, or a year later after significant changes are interesting too!
-
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
There is so much room in this industry for so many types of reviews! Reviews from inexperience in a genre, reviews from series veterans, reviews from people who struggle with control schemes, reviews from people whose backgrounds give them different perspectives on stories...
Pokaż ten wątek -
It's just really dang sad that there's a huge segment of people who don't care about context or nuance or anything that makes a good review good. If you don't share their opinion, your review is garbage, and you are garbage and shouldn't review games, you shill.
Pokaż ten wątek -
"How do we write better game reviews?" is a conversation that has nothing to do with anything anyone says in the comments section ever.
Pokaż ten wątek -
Anyway sorry, it's been a few weeks for AAA releases and people bitching about reviews being bad or good for reasons that have nothing to do with a review being of any quality at all and it sucks to see big industry figures dog whistle terrible people onto journalists also.
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I agree with all of this, especially how we should be doing thinkpieces tracking changes made to games. Games as a service like Destiny and The Division made huge leaps with post launch patches and DLC and should be looked at periodically IMO
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.