Not really. It suggests that use is worse than recycling.
-
-
-
I’d say it’s more a reminder that “reduce” and “reuse” come before “recycle” for a reason.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Um, the 21.3 percent that ends up as food... is the
counted as “refuse” or “lost to the environment”?Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Talk to me like I’m stupid: it says 40% of the materials are turned into housing and are used for more than one year. How can that not qualify as “better” than recycling?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
So 26% of waste is recycled? That is way more than I was expecting.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.