Conversation

Replying to
The unpleasant, inefficient "stroads" described in that video ... are basically all there is in north Seattle. They are *everywhere* -- cars trying to use them as arterials, even as they are lined with driveways & parking spaces. They suck for any/every purpose.
3
118
I think about the drive north from the zoo up to about 85th, on Phinney/Greenwood. It's actually one of the better places in Seattle & it's still abysmal: cars wanna go fast, bikes squeezed in tiny side lanes next to opening car doors, pedestrians wandering out into the street...
6
87
... somehow we've made it suck for everyone. It's unpleasant to drive, unpleasant to bike, unpleasant to walk. It doesn't serve any of its multiple purposes well. All because we simply can't imagine de-prioritizing cars, anywhere, no matter what. It's just unthinkable.
9
294
Show replies
Replying to and
land use codes, building codes, energy codes all preventing climate adaptive, livable, low-carbon living - even in (and especially in) cities.
Quote Tweet
thinking about this map showing ground temperatures at noon during last year's heat dome and how the hottest areas are basically industrial areas (blue) and areas where multifamily housing is legal (green) earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/148506/
Show this thread
Image
Image
1
26
Replying to and
Often the "stroads" are state managed highways and local planners can do nothing about it since they are built and managed by the state. At least that's often the case in Oregon.
1
3