Yeah, I’m not sure of that one either!
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
That act of interpretation is prob the key thing I'm interested in here (and used to think about specifically in context of radio pulsars)..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
...it's interesting because as a theorist you never know the whole pipeline from observational mess to neat theory...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
...I assumed *someone* studied this but didn't know who.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket
Astonishing coincidence that you, as a scientist in precisely this field, would have formed an interest in ethno b4 knowing of this study!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Yes it's odd! I wasn't so much interested in the phenomenological side then as I am now (tho was a bit), more like the data pipeline...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
i.e. starting from messy oscilloscope signals and then correcting for movement of earth, various noise sources etc...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Or tumbleweeds: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0007050 … (OK this isn't radio, but they're still trying to detect neutron stars)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket
Jeez! Tumbleweeds are common near where I live but I never thought of them as “massive” before
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
LIGO is ridiculously sensitive! They build the detectors in the middle of nowhere and still have to account for stuff like tumbleweed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.