If you do read the pulsar paper, please let me know what you think! A lot of similar work fails due to not understanding the science.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Just skimmed so far, writing style is... odd. Though I have no idea what papers in this field are normally like.pic.twitter.com/sLKfNlmfBA
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drossbucket
Yes, ethnometho is famous for that. One main reason no one has ever heard of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @drossbucket
Reading it now. Yeah, there’s a lot of discipline-specific jargon and axe-grinding going on here that may be impenetrable w/o background
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @drossbucket
Point of the first 1/3 (all I’ve read so far) is basically that an accurate analysis of the tape has to drop all theoretical suppositions
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @drossbucket
Slam against the other leading brands of sociological studies of science: their methods ignore WHAT THE SCIENTISTS ARE ACTUALLY DOINGpic.twitter.com/AysfyWqK4j
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @drossbucket
How a categorizable object emerges gradually from nebulosity through situated interpretation: the essence of ontological accomplishment!pic.twitter.com/kp1Rl6NnAI
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Thanks, pointing out these bits is helpful! Making another cup of tea and then will try again...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket @Meaningness
Maybe something I can actually understand will emerge from nebulosity
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drossbucket
Is it OK if I live-tweet my reading? It’s an interesting text for me; may be less relevant for you!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes please do! I am actually interested
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.