Rev is so clear-thinking that maybe can give a 140 character explanation—or summarize in a few tweets… ?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @drossbucket
Very wise mathematician once said, roughly: "In the beginning there were i and -i. But we don't know which is which. That's Galois theory."
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Unpacking: We create C from R by adjoining the roots of x^2 + 1 = 0. This has two roots. Pick one, call it i, then the other is -i ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...but we could have called either one i. That is, complex conjugation (sending i to -i) defines an automorphism C -> C.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The interesting thing is that the stabilizer of that automorphism is the base field, R. And this is a general phenomenon.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Start with a field F, create an extension field E by adjoining some elements r_i. Now look at the automorphism group G(E/F).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(If everything is "nice") the subgroups of G(E/F) correspond to intermediate fields between E and F, depending on which r_i they stabilize.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @drossbucket
Starting from G(C/R) gives an intuition I didn’t remember and may or may not have gotten at the time…
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That doesn’t give an intermediate field; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_Galois_theory … uses Q(√2,√3) which is quite intuitive
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev
That's the one I remember, but course was contextless 'bla bla splitting field bla solvable group bla'. Understanding something this time!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Also I followed my usual method earlier and looked up what John Baez had to say: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week201.html …
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.