Negative probability thread! (it's the tweet version of this blog post, as an experiment: https://drossbucket.wordpress.com/2019/08/01/negative-probability/ …)
-
-
Start with the consistent, YNN example, and ask the questions in turn. Before you start you are completely ignorant - probability ¼ of all boxes. After first question you narrow it to two boxes. View this as adding on a correction term:pic.twitter.com/HiqFHfcil8
Show this thread -
You can add one of these correction terms for the other two questions as well, ending up with the same as before:pic.twitter.com/58Fzyh4IvC
Show this thread -
And it also works for the inconsistent, NNN example! You can see how the bottom left box gets clobbered by the successive -¼s, as in my vague motivation at the start.pic.twitter.com/8mgW5CvKT2
Show this thread -
Is this trick any use? I really don't know! But I definitely find this breakdown more illuminating than just plugging through the algebra.
Show this thread -
Now the reason I'm interested in this is the link to quantum physics. This toy model is very similar to phase space for a qubit. In some sense it's slightly 'worse', as -½ is more negative than anything that comes up there. But the simple numbers make it easy to play with.
Show this thread -
For more information on how all this relates to quantum physics, see my follow up post: https://drossbucket.wordpress.com/2019/08/01/negative-probability-now-with-added-equations/ … May try a thread version of that one, too, but that'll be harder work. This is enough for today!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.