This may seem like an unlikely combination of books for my to find someone to crib notes but TBH I think I can name somewhere between three and ten followers who I'd expect to be familiar with all of these.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @DRMacIver
Read bits of all of these so I probably count for half of one of those people. You'll have to look elsewhere for the insight, but it's plausible to me that there is one!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drossbucket
Damn, you were one of the ones I thought most likely to have read all three. *adjusts estimates downwards slightly*
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver @drossbucket
In case I was another possible... I don’t know Gendlin although I have had extremely good intentions to rectify that for several years.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I gather he’s influenced by phenomenology (Heidegger?) so an overlap with MP makes sense. Kegan doesn’t have significant influence from phenomenology afaic remember, and doesn’t much talk about embodiment afaicr either.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @drossbucket
The thing I thought was likely a link there is that Gendlin has a lot of things to say about development and based on the Kegan video I watched they seem to have pretty aligned (not the same so much as complementary) values about what that should look like.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Roughly the link I'm looking at is Kegan & Gendlin: Development Gendlin & Merleau-Ponty: Embodiment and Perception Kegan & Merleau-Ponty: ??? (don't currently understand either half well enough to say)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver @drossbucket
Well, I did read M-P 30 years ago. I can’t remember much. He has some fascinating clinical case studies. I thought his theoretical points were all obvious (albeit obviously true). OTOH that’s probably because I’d absorbed them from downstream sources, and he originated them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Synthesizing Kegan with any body-oriented view, or more generally with a framework that prioritizes specifics and situatedness seems likely to be productive.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @DRMacIver
The Kegan-Gendlin synthesis I'd like to see is roughly the thing you talk about in your comment here: https://drossbucket.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/book-review-the-eureka-factor/ … i.e. paying attention to 'the growing feeling that a creative project is going to work', and how to detect when a field/idea is promising
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
For me at least a lot of this is some kind of unarticulated felt sense that is always worth interrogating - it's surprisingly detailed/subtle compared to my verbal understanding. This is the main reason I started reading Focusing, actually.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.