not to be rude but i still cant believe that san francisco seriously voted to block construction of a new building (with 15 below-market units) bc it would've cast a shadow on a park for like...an hour or two a day
Show this thread
that's 15 families that won't get to live in a dense walkable neighborhood because the people in power care more about a shadow covering 20% of the park for less than two hours on the longest day of the year than they do about housing people
-
-
anyway i dont live in SF and don't have a horse in this race but like...........damn
Show this thread -
also i know SF has weird microclimates and gets that foggy summer or whatever, but have any of these people ever been outdoors on a hot sunny day? shadows rule
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yep. I'm hoping that some sort of legal challenge to Prop K (the 1984 proposition that got the park shadow ban to be a law) arises. It's absurd. Plus for part of the time with the shadows on the park, the park isn't even _open_!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We definitely need to just get rid of the SF planning commission and change all approvals to ministerial
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No, it's like 60 families who won't get to live there. People live in the other housing units too, dammit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does that count as "viewshed NIMBYism"? I want to say it does
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.