At least they didn't waste a statisticians valuable time with this.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not seeing your point here John. Well designed study makes clear masks are safe in a vulnerable population. What’s the problem?
-
Does literally anybody think a mask is hazardous?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is wearing a mask political when its common sense. Yes the n of the study is weak, but even with 2k+ participants the conclusion wouldn't change. Attitudes like these make we wonder if existing seat-belt laws would even pass through legislation with today's political climate
-
Masks are fine but we don’t empirical evidence for them. That’s foolish. Hey
@RogueRad - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For a while now, JAMA has just been the journal of bad observational studies, social justice opinion pieces, and poems. It's been a joke for years.
-
The validity of the results of every study is judged by the quality of the data, the appropriateness of the analytic approach used, and the methods the investigators use to minimize bias. What study do you feel JAMA has published that has serious threats to the validity?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.