hiding true short interest via deep itm calls, insider communication among chief level officials regarding turning off the buy button... ?
-
What is perfectly normal about a stock over 100% short? Care to debunk?https://twitter.com/LucyKomisar/status/1450244491361783809 …
I'm saying the mechanism that makes it possible is normal, there's nothing sinister about rehypothecation per se. It's true that GME was unusually highly shorted, but that had nothing to do with market structure and more to do with the business fundamentals specific to GME
-
-
familiar with the term cellar boxing ?
-
From what I gather it's a conspiracy theory surrounding market makers and penny stocks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The current market structure allows this practice through the DTCC because of deregulation. Citadel was already banned from trading in China for 5 years for “malicious short selling” and “market manipulation”. If US regulatory loopholes didnt exist would >100% SI been allowed?
-
Yes, if securities laws were completely different then certain activities would become illegal, that is how the law works. I'm not sure what you are trying to say. My point is merely that rehypothecation is perfectly normal under current law and that the SEC found nothing wrong
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.