have it open in new tab not yet read through it to your point, not expecting much new information to be released and not furthermore little to no accountability for institutions involved in the manipulation leave it to the apes and their dd (best so far)
-
then that is exactly the definition of naked short selling. selling shares that don't exist (i.e. the amount percentage wise over the available float, as described in the report.)
I would urge you to research rehypothecation, this is the phenomenon which causes short interest to occasionally show >100%. This is a perfectly ordinary thing, read the below for a primer.pic.twitter.com/Za2p5Dr1Jo
-
-
will look into it more, thank you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is perfectly normal about a stock over 100% short? Care to debunk?https://twitter.com/LucyKomisar/status/1450244491361783809 …
-
I'm saying the mechanism that makes it possible is normal, there's nothing sinister about rehypothecation per se. It's true that GME was unusually highly shorted, but that had nothing to do with market structure and more to do with the business fundamentals specific to GME
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.