Enjoy the Central Park entry fees
-
-
Replying to @HedgeyeIndstrls
I said private use. The food carts do pay fees to be in central park, not a new concept
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HedgeyeIndstrls
They are by definition if they're driving privately owned vehicles
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drewg__ @HedgeyeIndstrls
Like walking in privately owned shoes in a public park?
#samething1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cashworth50 @HedgeyeIndstrls
Walking in the park doesn't come close to imposing the same massive externalities that driving private cars in Manhattan does. If you want to be technical, the purpose of this tax is so car owners pay back the hidden costs of their activity to the cityhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalities_of_automobiles?wprov=sfla1 …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Like I might be willing to agree with you if walking in the park caused gridlock congestion, lethal accidents, and toxic pollution but the fact is that it doesn't so taxing that kind of private activity makes no sense. There is no "hidden cost" to recover like there is with cars
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drewg__ @cashworth50
Have you ever taken the L train at rush hour?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @drewg__ @cashworth50
You care about this more than I do but it is primarily being implemented to pay for mta budget gaps. Taxes like this have a disproportionate impact on less wealthy people. It will also come when midtown is struggling to keep businesses.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The equity argument isn't supported by evidence--car owners are richer on average than non-car owners. Poor people are more likely to use transit than drive to work. This also implies that poor people will benefit more than rich people from any transit fixes funded by the tolls
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.