Sorry but no! Public space allocated for private use means you gotta pay renthttps://twitter.com/CrainsNewYork/status/1441491842776936449 …
-
Walking in the park doesn't come close to imposing the same massive externalities that driving private cars in Manhattan does. If you want to be technical, the purpose of this tax is so car owners pay back the hidden costs of their activity to the cityhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externalities_of_automobiles?wprov=sfla1 …
Like I might be willing to agree with you if walking in the park caused gridlock congestion, lethal accidents, and toxic pollution but the fact is that it doesn't so taxing that kind of private activity makes no sense. There is no "hidden cost" to recover like there is with cars
-
-
Have you ever taken the L train at rush hour?
-
The subway has a $2.75 fare man
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Exactly
End of conversation
-
-
-
there's plenty of pedestrians I see that I would consider toxic.
-
Lmfao
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.