i truly believe that onlyfans banning explicit material is an intentional strategy to tank it and the intention was not for it to "last" but to generate quite a lot of money that a handful of people walk away with
-
-
Replying to @M01R4
i think it's just idiots trying to make the company safe enough for institutional investors to invest in. the goal—walking away with a bunch of money—is ultimately the same though
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kierandhanrahan @M01R4
I read it was their bank/payment providers that made the demand and they just flat out caved, which is definitely something they would only do if they were trying to close a spac deal or IPO
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drewg__ @kierandhanrahan
right i'm saying that OF was made by people who knew they would have to remove its largest userbase in order to keep using banks and as a result the intentional end point is not a sustained, sfw userbase, it was making money off of sex workers until mastercard made it a problem
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @M01R4 @kierandhanrahan
What's odd though is that the cashflow associated with subscription based porn on OF is what makes it valuable, paradoxically I don't think there is a viable business case for them to go public at a big valuation in the absence of porn. If I was them I would just find a new bank!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
drew Retweeted Elmer Spud
this explains so much lmaohttps://twitter.com/PlugInFUD/status/1428525423453868035?s=20 …
drew added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.