i truly believe that onlyfans banning explicit material is an intentional strategy to tank it and the intention was not for it to "last" but to generate quite a lot of money that a handful of people walk away with
-
right i'm saying that OF was made by people who knew they would have to remove its largest userbase in order to keep using banks and as a result the intentional end point is not a sustained, sfw userbase, it was making money off of sex workers until mastercard made it a problem
What's odd though is that the cashflow associated with subscription based porn on OF is what makes it valuable, paradoxically I don't think there is a viable business case for them to go public at a big valuation in the absence of porn. If I was them I would just find a new bank!
-
-
this explains so much lmaohttps://twitter.com/PlugInFUD/status/1428525423453868035?s=20 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.