what if investors come in many categories and a universal broad stroke “protection” doesn’t fit everyone equally what if
-
missing the point - if you want to take a high risk trade with going to zero shot, you should be able to with a small percentage of your portfolio. So a qualification system proving you know how to diversify could work. Sweeping regs are not that. I’d bet on tails w small size
"protections" and "sweeping regs" are imprecise terms of debate, I'm curious what you are actually concerned about for your business? We already live in a world where I can make risky trades with a small % of portfolio, I don't see it changing
-
-
selling a put is a limit order where you get paid to bid, easy to understand and allowed to do it in robinhood on equities no problem - how do you do it on eth based in new york city in front of screens
-
You and I both know that the clearing/settlement infra for equities is miles more regulated than in crypto, it all runs through DTCC which is a literal central choke point for all US equities, is that what you're saying you want to see in crypto? Because that's how equities works
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
how about "investors don't need as much protections preventing them from executing convex strategies?" nobody gets BTFO'd being convex
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.