Also on vacation, I read The Blocksize War, by @jonathanbier, about Bitcoin's scaling schism (2015-2017). Brilliant book. I thought I knew the story pretty well, but there was a ton of new stuff that I learned. Will write a review for the blog this weekhttps://www.amazon.com/Blocksize-War-controls-Bitcoins-protocol/dp/B08YQMC2WM/ref=nodl_ …
-
-
-
-
Status quo design guarantees low throughput, the exact reason that upstarts like Solana surged in to fill the scalability void and put the Solana chain's high TPS figures right on the front of the tin
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
It's a long game
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
For sure, but to the extent that the scalability problem is solved in the BTC ecosystem, it has been solved by centralization. There's a reason exchange traded happen in a high performance database and not on the chain itself. BTC is many things, but a trading technology it ain't
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Yeah, it's definitely not a trading technology. But it can aspire to be something else. And FWIW, I see Solana more as an ETH competitor than a Bitcoin. Just a totally different ballgame.
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Right, I mean to get into the use cases behind Bitcoin (to the extent that one can speak of such things) requires more of a "macro thesis" around the banking system or fiat money or whatever cranky thing people say now. It's *anticipating* a problem, not solving one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But the same is true of holding tons of bullion, which is the whole idea that the smallblockers had in mind so 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.