Don't use fix use binary protocols if you can, better latency
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @drewg__ @nope_its_lily and
What are the differences? I've setup tons of new trading accounts and every time we get to the technicals, ie: "do you guys want to use FIX?" I would just loop in support staff.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @saanglee @nope_its_lily and
Fields are in fixed positions and don't require parsing by a fix engine when you trade binary protocols, saves some compute cycles. Fix more flexible and human friendly but you lose out on speed
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
yeah this is the correct answer. most of the time when you’re getting multicast from an exchange it comes in as a fixed size binary protocol. fix engines are slow
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @theemilyaccount @drewg__ and
Assuming it doesn't matter too much to institutions who trade size (vwap otd) on a longer-ish time horizon?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
they’d just execute through a broker for latency sensitive stuff (or best-in-class execution services with white label algo support)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @theemilyaccount @drewg__ and
Just trying to get an idea of what my orders when I was working were going through. If I were to send an EMSX order on bbg to a broker (EMSX uses FIX iirc...), would they just take that order and execute on their end with binary protocols?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Yeah probably through a broker algo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.