Why is it better to give money to 100 pension funds than to 1.5 wholesalers? I don't know, let's call it my opinion
-
-
Replying to @AlexanderGerko
if we factor in the overhead costs of 100 pension funds, it is not really obvious to me why so many of them should exist while all they do is primarily indexing. And there are a few more types of "insitutional investors" whose societal value is arguably same as wholesaler
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EvgenyGaevoy
Well even if you believe that a random asset manager doesn't bring value to its clients of society in general, at least let them compete for this flow
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @AlexanderGerko
thats what they do, not very successfully in a fair competition. I feel like what you propose is regulation so that they can be successful, while I think they should die or evolve
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EvgenyGaevoy
What do you mean "that's what they do"? they literally have no access to this flow
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @EvgenyGaevoy
you have no idea what you are talking about, go read something about US equities market structure
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AlexanderGerko
I read Flash Boys, does that count?
Maybe you are just bitter because you guys cant compete in new environement and thats it...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @AlexanderGerko
He is pretty quiet about inner xtx workings:)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Gotta agree with gerko here, you can argue that retail flow internalization is good for retail, that's one thing, but arguing that it's preferable to have fat internalizer profits instead of tighter markets for pension funds... It's not the argument I would make
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
