Assets managers compensated based on AUM have little incentive to reduce or liquidate equity holdings and move into cash or fixed income that pays so little, clients would just remove those reallocated $'s out of the accounts to avoid the Fees.
-
-
Replying to @InterestArb
Isn't that the point? They're paid to take risks and generate alpha not provide cash management after all. Baupost has seen client redemptions for exactly this reason
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @InterestArb
Yeah definitely I do agree, I think it's a healthy phenomenon for the most part
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drewg__
I like your choice of the word "phenomenon", I think it is part of a bias that promotes higher equity market prices which may not reflect intrinsic valuations
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
To the extent that equities fund managers take larger position sizes than they otherwise would to stay out of cash, the effect on prices is probably marginal. Usually when an equities fund gets too big for the strategy to work the managers tend to raise fees and/or close the fund
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.