Yess!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Indeed, the "displacement" doesn't seem to have very strong archeological support, it seems more the parts of southern and eastern Britain in close trade contact with the lands across the Channel saw ongoing immigration and mingling of cultures. ...
- Show replies
-
-
-
Is this the place where I talk about Arthurian legend as a propaganda tool of late-medieval autocracies? Maybe not, never mind
-
But if you could do a thread on it, that would be great. I'm very interested in myth as means of control.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes! My Arthurian students have been making good use of your chapter in the new Malory companion—thanks for this!
-
Thanks, Jes! I'm glad it's useful!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah. Anyone who is talking about "King" Arthur rather than a roving warlord with a band of superheroes has no right to complain that some version isn't traditional.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And, at the same time, the western and northern part of Britain was still very much in contact with the Mediterranean in trade, despite the Romans leaving. The notion that there wouldn't have been any black folks about Devon/Cornwall is quite anachronistic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.