Dr Doug McNeall

@dougmcneall

Climate scientist and statistician, Met Office Hadley Centre and University of Exeter Global Systems Institute. Married to .

UK
Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @dougmcneall

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @dougmcneall

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    19. pro 2016.

    A scientist's prayer Lord, prove me wrong but cite me while you do it.

    Poništi
  2. prije 5 sati
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    Good advice here for remote post-docing. Hey, if anyone's interested in a remote post doc with me, I am definitely up for writing a grant application. Various possibilities. Maths/stats/climate/weather/models/uncertainty/experts/complexity. Email me.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    People often ask what the oldest piece of plastic we have found is. Probably this block of gutta percha, over 100 years old and from a shipwreck. Gutta percha is widely seen as the 1st natural plastic & said to be of fundamental importance in the history of the plastics industry.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 4. velj

    What’s next? Vaccine denial?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 4. velj

    Why is Exeter Phoenix promoting this dangerous public health misinformation bullshit?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 4. velj

    You might expect something like this to happen when modelling groups start publishing their tuning protocols.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 4. velj

    Before: Explicit - climatology. Implicit - historical warming. Now: Explicit - climatology Implicit - None Along with a bunch of new processes that weren’t resolved or included before.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 4. velj

    Stop me if you’ve heard this before (or point me to it) but I think that what is going on inCMIP6 might be the result of moving from an implicit to an explicit tuning target.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    The latest edition of the Weather Snap podcast looks at greenhouse gases - what are they and why are levels rising?

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Could a machine ever be as big as a human? Ten machine scientists argue that the idea of "super-sized machines" is implausible science fiction: what does it even mean to be "human-sized", anyway?

    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    To answer my own question somewhat, here’s a list. I’ve had good experiences with on this list (a fine South West company).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 31. sij

    I found a good deal on environmentally and ethically conscious basics at , but where can I buy good jeans (uk)?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 31. sij

    Our podcast on sea level rise is back up, after a few technical difficulties. I interviewed Prof. Jonathan Gregory. Check out this deep dive into the past, present and future of sea level.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Morning Twitter! I have a little vignette into aviation industry climate malfeasance for your enjoyment 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Climate scientist describes how having children and realising that his work as a climate scientist will inform their future has been the biggest catalyst for making changes in his family’s life to reduce their contribution to climate change

    Poništi
  17. 30. sij

    Has anybody got any work on what tail-risk probabilities for catastrophe policy makers find useful? Cause one-in-ten (or even one-in-100) doesn’t feel that extreme.

    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    Robustly and truthfully defend the use of the scenario, talk about what we might do next and better, and then put it aside and continue telling people about what climate change means for them.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 30. sij

    They’re meant to distract from the real and serious consequences of a changing climate. [I don’t mean the new paper].

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 30. sij

    The attacks on the legitimate use of a worst-case scenario climate forcing are happening because the “skeptics” feel on the back foot.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    . & correctly highlight that RCP8.5 *emissions* are not "business-as-usual" BUT it's important to note that in Earth System models, the RCP8.5 CO2 *concentration pathway* can still arise from a lower emissions scenario (eg. SRES A1B) if feedbacks are strong

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·