It's an excruciatingly slow process. Because of course teachers have control over their classroom, but not over the papers I have to sit & the people who mark them. I have no idea what my conclusion is, but I think it's possible to agree with both @dorothyk98 & @LucyAllenFWR
My point was that the discussion from 3 of the speaker’s kept querying about how to explain their personal in the scholarship they are teaching. I said this has been done b/c 4 decades of intersectional feminism has theorized autoethnography as critical/methodological praxis.
-
-
It's work that still needs doing, I think. I think this is a difference we have. All the reading in the world doesn't compare to having the experience.
-
But this is what is perplexing to me. The point of autoethnography is to center experience. And you are imagining that instructors who are almost entirely white and often male will have the experience to understand their most marginalized students. So what exactly are you saying
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, my perspective is more diverse than this, I think - this is why I bring in queer theory and second-wave feminisms, despite my reservations about both. It's a *big* conversation. A great conversation, but initially a potentially alienating one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.