In 5 seconds IRL he confirmed my reservations abt anything his session would do. Pattern based on CFP & alienating comments throughout conf.
-
-
I never saw the CFP, only the panel description. I am not surprised at the rest, sadly.
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ADMedievalist @JonathanHsy and
&
@dorothyk98's 'someone should tweet'. Together, these read as "someone should tweet about how badly this panel of white people fails' & 6/7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
About racial and religious minorities. Was there even anyone on the panel who was not Christian?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
a much more mutable and contextual concept. More so when dealing with vastly different times, places. Based on your def, I would respond 2/
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Medievalists just do not want to read the experts who have debunked this theory
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think that is a poor analogy
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The Carolingian law code without a clue and having never read the recent critical discussion. Seriously back off. You are being a troll.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98 @ADMedievalist and
Why the hostility? Older scholarship gets challenged all the time. It's the nature of academia.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProvAtlantic @dorothyk98 and
I am neither hostile nor challenging Dorothy's expertise in her own field. My field's different, but also questions how other is constructed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I beg to differ. Yes you are. And you are not getting my point or the points of what others have said. The frame of "other" is the problem.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.