Never discussed what they said b/c I & no one else not there does not know. If they want a full convo, why not say what they said
-
-
Dorothy, you are putting words in my mouth that I have not said, and as far as I can tell, you've proclaimed rules for how ppl in other 1/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fields are allowed to explore a concept that has been embedded in at least some of those fields for at least as long as the theoretical 2/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
approaches you advocate. I have said that I wanted to discuss in a format I find more conducive to clear communication. But as far as I 3/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can tell, much of this boils down to a disagreement over methodological approaches and who gets to/must use them in particular circumstances
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why the hostility? Older scholarship gets challenged all the time. It's the nature of academia.
-
I am neither hostile nor challenging Dorothy's expertise in her own field. My field's different, but also questions how other is constructed
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Kim is a well-respected expert on race in Medieval studies. I'm disturbed by the dismissal of a scholar of color's expertise I see here.
-
So what happened?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.