The frame is racist and has been discussed as such in numerous peer reviewed publications.
-
-
Repeating. No sense in this discussion in this format, especially at this time, when there is no genuine interest in dialogue.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Never discussed what they said b/c I & no one else not there does not know. If they want a full convo, why not say what they said
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yet despite knowing nothing, you felt justified in implying colleagues would be DOIN IT RONG, & that s'one should report back on Twitter.
12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Instead, they upset enough of us in conference encounters that some of us did not want to go to this session at all. I was in another panel.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
In 5 seconds IRL he confirmed my reservations abt anything his session would do. Pattern based on CFP & alienating comments throughout conf.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I never saw the CFP, only the panel description. I am not surprised at the rest, sadly.
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ADMedievalist @JonathanHsy and
&
@dorothyk98's 'someone should tweet'. Together, these read as "someone should tweet about how badly this panel of white people fails' & 6/7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
About racial and religious minorities. Was there even anyone on the panel who was not Christian?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
differently. But that's not the def I was working from. /3
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
This is the same point about others. So stop it.Stop making us do the emotional labor of explaining this when you did not attend our session
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.