Can you clarify? Any effort we can make at whatever pacing (short and long term) is needed IMHO!
-
-
Replying to @JonathanHsy
I'm not proposing an either/or approach. Just saying we shouldn't have 2 eradicate white supremacism within our field b4 we claim moral
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @KentNavalesi @JonathanHsy
eliminating white nationalism in our field kind of an intellectual and moral imperative, imo, considering the+
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @MedievalPhDemon @JonathanHsy
danger/violence it poses to others both within the field (e.g. POC scholars) and outside it (e.g. Students).
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MedievalPhDemon @JonathanHsy
it's a false equivalence to conflate getting rid of an *actively violent threat* with "purity politics."
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MedievalPhDemon @JonathanHsy
I guess there are many degrees between the two. Blatant (or even not so blatant) racism is one thing, but too often it does devolve into +
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Language policing, trying to out-critique voices on your own side.
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
isn't it also question of who we consider our "public" to be? plenty evidence that many medievalists still conceive of "the public"
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Ummm, as several senior medievalists have come out as blatantly racist and willing to write for the AR, why r u imagining MS is not racist?
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
How are senior medievalists consistently praising & writing for the AR "language-policing"? As they embrace well known AR figures?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.