@BookPitcher @saragoldrickrab so why exactly did he avoid the BLM protestors then? Why not bring those 2 together? BLM already has.
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
He didn't ignore them, or fight them, or have them removed. He disengaged--which I'd do with a screaming kid.
@dorothyk98@saragoldrickrab6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BookPitcher
@BookPitcher@saragoldrickrab supposed to disrupt. Do you call any of the occupy, pro-choice, environmental protestors the same names?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
They all disrupt, & disruption is needed. EFFECTIVE disruption. All they did today is stop an opportunity.
@dorothyk98@saragoldrickrab1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BookPitcher
@BookPitcher@dorothyk98 I'd say#BlackLivesMatter
is extraordinarily effective actually. Whitesplaining it renders "us" ineffective.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @saragoldrickrab
BLM IS extraordinarily effective. Three shouting individuals did not help the message.
@saragoldrickrab@dorothyk982 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BookPitcher
@BookPitcher@saragoldrickrab they controlled the narrative of this visit. Incredibly effective.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
If what they wanted to say was "angry women out-shout politicians." It could have been far more effective.
@dorothyk98@saragoldrickrab1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BookPitcher
@BookPitcher@saragoldrickrab umm. Calling black women legitimately upset "angry" is racist.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dorothyk98
Isn't calling women who are legitimately angry "upset" trivializing their feelings?
@dorothyk98@saragoldrickrab2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BookPitcher @saragoldrickrab and racist. And it has been discussed in numerous articles. Feel free to google "angry black women"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.