@cliotropic yes!
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 I guess the question then is: how do humanities disciplines get the kind of easily-testable assessments STEM relies on?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @cliotropic
@dorothyk98 or does humanities' traditional reliance on "I know quality when I see it" fail us hard when trying to do SoTL-style research?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cliotropic
@cliotropic it might be the answer is x problem. Difficult for computational judgement2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 right. But at scale, that leaves us relying on objective-format testing that assesses higher-order thinking skills.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cliotropic
@dorothyk98 which is possible to do (see Bean, Engaging Ideas) but requires a lot of up-front work2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cliotropic
@cliotropic and thus, the investment issue. Though they will invest in other areas.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 well, if (IFF) profs have strong enough IP protection & good-faith deans, shared/collab course development is one option.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @cliotropic
@cliotropic yes. But will they have enough incentive to do it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 on a traditional 9-month teaching contract with research expectations that require summer travel, not bloody likely. Incentives.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.