... held out hope that the paper copy would say something different. (2/2) #academicpublishing #peerreview #bleh
-
-
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 Mostly pissed off about rejection based entirely on stylistic questions and reviewer being "not excited enough."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 Yeah, I really honest-to-God don't understand how the reader's remarks ended in a decision to reject.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @homophonous
@homophonous the editorial staff should have called it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 The process is corrupt and bullshit, and what really rankles (have said this before) is that it's the only thing that counts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @homophonous
@homophonous it is total bs
12:40 PM - 21 Nov 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.