So I asked, and for tweeting photos I take here at the Bod they refer me to the permission forms. I've checked those, and they specify +
-
-
Replying to @SLevelt
+ online use must be either password or IP address protected, if I understand them correctly. Costs vary from £40 upwards per image.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SLevelt
So there won't be much tweeting nice details I find, I'm afraid. And I don't even want to show pretty illuminations; my thing is text.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 I understand the wish for control and money, but when it comes to obviously non-commercial, well-credited use of pics of small +1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SLevelt
@dorothyk98 + details, mostly of marginalia and the like, it seems a bit silly1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SLevelt
@SjoerdLevelt has Erik Kwakkel ever been able to use Bod stuff on twitter or tumbler?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 He'll come here in Feb for Lowe lectures, so we'll see! But I'd rather not have my experience make it impossible for him, too1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SLevelt
@SjoerdLevelt true. There must be some agreement @ advertising projects where images r already given license .
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dorothyk98
@dorothyk98 it's all moving anyway; permission to take pics is an amazing leap forward.Forms of fair use now need to be found, and they will1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@SjoerdLevelt really, I went overboard last time with my iPhone.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.