It's super interesting b/c people get all twisted when I point to Omi and Winant just as a very standard baseline (b/c Medieval has no baseline let alone definitions or anything) & then people have white tears & then forget that I actually do lots of CRT work, & clear in work my
-
-
But it's so interesting b/c the thing I find most interesting about Omi and Winant, other than they are baseline in social sciences, is the way they sketch out the historiography of race in the 20th c. For the theory, ppl have to decide which genealogy they are working &
-
and theory stuff is much more involved and takes a while to work through. I read Weheliye in 2014 & thought I might use it in an article I was planning to right. But the density made me withdraw from writing the article b/c I realized, I need to do more reading, work etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.