Thread: So, the thing that strikes me here is actually about larger issues in relation to CRT & journals. This is on my mind b/c I am on a panel organized by @janineutell for the @celj_editors about editing and race at #MLA2021 in Jan. 1/https://twitter.com/JonathanHsy/status/1341008738564657160 …
-
-
But on top of that, even the most conservative medieval studies journal has the editorial courtesy of offering a response to the person who has been reviewed deleteriously. But apparently, these basics of academic scholarly courtesy cannot be given to a senior WOC scholar. 5/
Show this thread -
If they can't do that, what do you imagine they will do to junior scholars work who are BIPOC and working on CRT? This is a journal I would say, "stay away," b/c they will just waste your time, reject your work b/c you do CRT. The time wasting is particularly terrible 6/
Show this thread -
for jr. folks b/c they are on a timeline for publication and this is going to make them waste time. We really need to start writing some sort of wiki/guide something something that tells people, don't send stuff to x and y journal b/c against CRT work. End.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.