For clarification, what do people mean when they write that author x couldn't have been talking about race "since 'Race' did not carry its modern meaning"? Are they deliberately delegitimizing an entire subfield PCRS and #ShakeRace 1/
-
Show this thread
-
or are they exposing their ignorance of how race and racial formation work, not through biological pseudoscience but through multiple and contingent meanings that hinge on forms of somatic and cultural difference to effect power and domination? 2/2
#ShakeRace1 reply 1 retweet 39 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @DrDadabhoy
Oh the argument used regularly by medievalists for decades. Circular logic. All the white moral equivalency fallacies.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrDadabhoy
Every single time, completely showing their scholarly white cluelessness and white innocence move.
11:56 AM - 28 Sep 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.