and I can write about scholarly editing in relation to intersectional feminist theory:https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-4e08b137-aec5-49a4-83c0-38258425f145/section/1d687579-21ed-4f2e-b926-1328866cde89 …
-
Show this thread
-
And like literally, did we skip Archive Stories: https://www.amazon.com/Archive-Stories-Fictions-Writing-History/dp/082233688X/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=archive+stories&qid=1595126797&sr=8-1 …
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Or
@jmjafrx excellent article "Markup Bodies" https://read.dukeupress.edu/social-text/article-abstract/36/4%20(137)/57/137032/Markup-BodiesBlack-Life-Studies-and-Slavery-Death …1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
The amazing work in the Critical Archive issue: https://journals.litwinbooks.com/index.php/jclis/article/view/50 …
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
I taught this 2 weeks after it came out in my Literary Mediascapes class (yes, I do a long book history class folks Parchment to Arduino)
@jsench "Under Pressure": https://muse.jhu.edu/article/734588/summary …1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
I am delayed (oh COVID), but I am writing an entire thing about Bella Da Costa Greene's manuscript collection & Whiteness and Property & how radical cataloging may show various forms of Black woman's resistance to the world of 20th c. rare book libraries & archives.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
So no, I really don't understand why someone being a "documentary editor" is somehow the reason why he is a settler colonial racist scholar. Please do not use the, "book history" "Documentary Editor" excuse. Please, Editing is not NEUTRAL & never has been.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
As a medievalist, you know how many scribes in the premodern archive were interventionist, racist, sexist, ableist, terrible af. MANY. Am I going to go around & say, Chaucer is not a racist, rapist, antisemitic tool of white supremacist empire. No. (said it multiple times).
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
So why is being a "documentary editor" of Jackson's papers somehow the reason why Feller is what he is. I would really suggest people reexamine this very several decades behind scholarly on scholarly editing. Do not use this as the shield for his terrible. It is not.
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @dorothyk98
Plus, Feller was a "regular" tenured book-writing scholar before taking over at the Jackson Papers. He's resented other historians long before he became an editor, believe me.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I am not even sure why people are trying to use "documentary editor" as an excuse.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.