doing his job by saying the things he said & doing "documentary editing." Please, I've given talks about this, yes, there are multiple possibilities w/ scholarly editing, but at this point especially when we are grounding it in digital, we are at the archival turn in editing. 2/
-
-
As a medievalist, you know how many scribes in the premodern archive were interventionist, racist, sexist, ableist, terrible af. MANY. Am I going to go around & say, Chaucer is not a racist, rapist, antisemitic tool of white supremacist empire. No. (said it multiple times).
Show this thread -
So why is being a "documentary editor" of Jackson's papers somehow the reason why Feller is what he is. I would really suggest people reexamine this very several decades behind scholarly on scholarly editing. Do not use this as the shield for his terrible. It is not.
Show this thread -
Though book history and scholarly editing folks, you all need to figure out why this is even being used as a shield and where your antiracist, decolonial, Black feminist, queer, trans, and disability conversations are happening.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.